Moultrie Observer

Local News

August 27, 2008

No guarantees for Highway 133, DOT official says

MOULTRIE — The $15 million in federal and state dollars already spent for preliminary work on Ga. Hwy. 133 does not guarantee that widening project will become reality, a Georgia Department of Transportation official said Wednesday.

The department earlier this year put all road projects that were not under way on hold until road projects are prioritized. In April, Gov. Sonny Perdue ordered an outside audit of the DOT after evidence surfaced that the state promised $1 billion more in transportation contracts than it had the money to fund.

On Wednesday, David Norwood, the department’s design group manager, said that Highway 133 is in development but that there is no funding earmarked for four-laning the roadway from Albany to Valdosta.

The state has canceled 140 project contracts in 2008, said Norwood, who spoke at a meeting in Moultrie with elected leaders and economic development officials from cities and counties through which the highway passes. Representatives for U.S. Sens. Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson and U.S. Reps. Sanford Bishop and Jim Marshall were at the meeting. State Sen. John Bulloch and state Reps. Penny Houston, Ed Rynders and Richard Royal also attended.

Each project will be weighed on its merits and if an individual project costs too much “we’ll cut our losses,” he said.

That means even though money has been spent on the preliminary design and environmental work there is no guarantee Highway 133 work will be funded, he said.

The department expects to have the priority list completed by the end of the year and will then further prioritize by the amount of money available and by congressional district, Norwood said.

The last estimate for the 133 project put the price tag at $340 million, he said.

The remarks from Norwood included nothing new, but did alert representatives to the challenge they face, said Max Hancock, the former Colquitt County Commission chairman who is heading up the effort to fast-track the widening project.

“The thing we want to keep in mind is there’s going to be decisions made,” he said after the meeting. “There are ways to help affect some of those decisions. When the decisions are made, we want to be at the table.”

Hancock said that when the highway was first put on the state’s list years ago the estimated cost was $160 million. Delaying the project further will only add to the cost.

“This is a project that’s important enough to warrant funding when the decision is made,” he said.

Text Only
Local News
Business Marquee
AP Video
US, UK Pressure on Syria; More Homs Violence Raw Video: Mass Killer Wants Medal, Freedom Few Answers in Death of Sons of Missing Utah Mom Court Strips Contador of Tour De France Title Runaway Goat Leads Police on Wild Chase And the Winner for Best Super Bowl Ad Is... Raw Video: Deadly Helicopter Crash in Australia Raw Video: Smoke, Purported Gunfire in Syria Romney Latest Poll to Join Let-me-explain Club Blast Kills Husband of Missing Utah Mom, 2 Boys Obama: US, Israel Will Work Against Iran Nukes NJ Museum Finds 19th Century Recording Snow Causes Disruptions in Much of Europe Clinton: Vetoed U.N. Syria Resolution 'travesty' Romney Picks Up Decisive Win in Nevada Caucuses Gingrich Renews Vow to Campaign Until Convention Romney Rolls to Easy Win in Nevada GOP Caucuses Raw Video: Missing Family Found Alive in Ore. Police Clear Tents From Occupy Site in DC Killer of Fla. Girl Found in Landfill Gets Life
House Ads
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Popular Searches
Powered by Local.com
More
weatherradar
Seasonal Content
Community Calendar
Loading…
Events by eviesays.com
Poll

Should candidates for county positions have to run for a party's nomination?

No. Political parties are meaningless at this level.
Yes. It helps voters know where they stand on issues.
With all the problems the state's facing, this is a non-issue.
     View Results